State and Public Employees Federation condemn – systemically attacks.
“Udayan” Editor was assaulted from the Jaffna university compound and “ Sudar Oli” Administration Director E.Saravanabawan’s vehicle was smashed are much condemned was stated by the All Ceylon State and Public Employees Federation Leader S.Loganathan.

The statement released on behalf of the Federation further pointed out the brutal attacks against the journalists mainly in the north, is continuing.
A part of this is the attack incident occurred against the “Udayan” Editor who visited Jaffna university compound to collect information directly about the students protest was attacked.
Those who are the protectors of law and peoples security are engaged in these nasty attacks which should be considered as a systemically action.
We have given ample media freedom which are only stated verbally, but the activities internally are functioning to suppress the medias, and to crush the voices, which are currently intensifies in the country.
“Udayan” which a peoples voice in the north, function with media ethics is hatred by some sectors was the cause for the Jaffna campus incident.
Attacks against “Udayan” Editor and Administration Director’s attacks are strongly condemned by our Federation, and whatever sectors are connected with this incident, appropriate action should be taken which we appeal was stated.
Sunday , 02 December 2012
On Removal Of Judges
Here is an extract from a lecture delivered by Mr. H.L.de Silva President Counsel, (Senior Counsel who appeared for Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranayake and for the Sri Lanka Freedom Party in many instances)
The “theme “of the lecture was “THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN THE PROTECTION OF CONSTITIUTIONAL RIGHT DELIVERED AT SEMINAR ORGANIZED by the Council of Liberal Democracy.
Article could found in ‘IDEAS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS” Edited by Dr.Chanaka Amaratunga -1989
Page 495-509 and paragraph could be found on pages 505 and 506,
Article could found in ‘IDEAS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS” Edited by Dr.Chanaka Amaratunga -1989
Page 495-509 and paragraph could be found on pages 505 and 506,
On Removal of Judges
Chief Justice unveiled the bust of late H.L.de Silva – July 27,2011
Having regard to these far reaching powers it appears to be in congruous for Parliament determine a procedure under Article 107(3) by framing Standing Orders that give the power to Select Committee of the House to determine whether or not a judge of the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeal has been guilty of misbehavior or incapacitated, as ground for removal from office. The determination of guilt when a judge is charged with misconduct is clearly an exercise of judicial power by Parliament directly, which is inconsistent with Article 4(c), since it does not fall within the exception therein mentioned. I my submission, what is contemplated in Article 107(3) is prescribing procedure which enables the guilt of a judge to be determined by a body competent to exercise judicial power directly, namely a court, tribunal or other institution established for the purpose. It is only after a judicial finding by such a body that Parliament is empowered under Article 107 to vote on the question of his removal. The existing procedural anomaly needs to be remedied.
(This paragraph is also can found in “IDEAS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS” , EDITED BY Dr Chanaka Amaratunga revised and abridged by Dr Rajiva Wijesinha-2007- IBH Publishers at page 239)
(This paragraph is also can found in “IDEAS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS” , EDITED BY Dr Chanaka Amaratunga revised and abridged by Dr Rajiva Wijesinha-2007- IBH Publishers at page 239)
*Sent by Kamal Nissanka, Attorney-at-Law, Secretary General, Liberal Party of Sri Lanka
Posted by Thavam
